The National Border Patrol Council (NBPC), representing 16,000 hardworking agents, threw its weight behind former President Donald Trump for the 2024 election. Why? Frustration. A deep-seated frustration with what they see as the ineffective, even damaging, border policies of the Biden-Harris administration. The NBPC made this clear during a rally in Prescott, Arizona—a place where Trump and border agents didn’t just shake hands but built a relationship rooted in mutual respect and common goals.
Union President Paul Perez didn’t hold back. He pointed the finger directly at Vice President Kamala Harris, accusing her policies of letting unvetted people pour into the country, with crime rates to follow. It’s a concern that’s not new. The NBPC has long pushed for tougher immigration laws and stronger border security, areas where they say Trump delivered and the current administration is dropping the ball. The endorsement isn’t just about Trump—it’s about getting back to the border policies they believe actually worked.
Trump’s Border Security Accomplishments
Key Border Security Measures Under Trump
- ✅ Dismantled ‘Catch and Release’: Detained illegal immigrants instead of releasing them into the U.S. while awaiting hearings.
- 🧱 Border Wall Construction: Built over 400 miles of border wall.
- 📉 Reduced Illegal Crossings: 87% drop in unlawful crossings where the wall was built.
- 🤝 International Agreements: Established asylum and migration agreements with Central American countries.
- 🛂 Efficient Processing: Implemented efficient processing of asylum-seekers at entry points.
The NBPC’s endorsement doesn’t just highlight frustration with the current administration—it sparks real questions about where American immigration policy is headed. If Donald Trump returns to office, his game plan is clear: ask Congress for the funds to bring on 10,000 more Border Patrol agents and tighten immigration controls. It’s not just about numbers; it’s about going back to what worked. Think back to those historic deals with Central American countries, which Trump says helped curb asylum fraud. Compare that with the Biden-Harris approach, which the NBPC sees as too soft and a threat to U.S. sovereignty. It’s a stark difference: one side promising to bolster security and the other, according to the union, leaving the borders wide open.
The Political Landscape
The ongoing impeachment proceedings against DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, led by Republicans in the House, serve as a powerful statement of just how deep the opposition runs against the Biden-Harris administration’s approach to border control. It’s not just a few critics here and there—this is a party-wide movement to push back on what they see as a failure to manage the crisis at the southern border. Mayorkas is right in the crosshairs, accused of allowing policies that have only fueled the chaos.
On the flip side, when you look at Trump’s time in office, you hear a lot about practical solutions. One standout is the Migrant Protection Protocols, better known as the “Remain in Mexico” policy. This partnership with Mexico kept asylum seekers south of the border while their claims were processed, easing the strain on U.S. resources and reducing fraud. It’s the kind of policy that border agents and security experts tend to appreciate because it aimed to cut through the clutter and handle the problem at its roots.
Trump’s policies weren’t about open borders or endless bureaucracy. They were about taking action—partnering with countries like Mexico to help manage the flow of migrants in a way that made sense for everyone involved. These efforts, which many on the right view as common sense, stand in stark contrast to what’s happening now, where many feel that leniency has replaced sovereignty and control has been lost in the process.
Contrasting Approaches to Border Security
Conservative Approach
- Uphold rule of law
- Secure borders
- Implement federally backed immigration processes
- Focus on national security
- Support practical law enforcement measures
Progressive Approach
- Prioritize leniency
- Support open-door policies
- Focus on humanitarian concerns
- Emphasize immigrant rights
- Advocate for comprehensive immigration reform
The NBPC’s endorsement of Trump is more than just a nod to his candidacy—it’s a reflection of widespread dissatisfaction with the current administration’s handling of border policies. It signals a clear preference for strategies that put order, security, and strong support for law enforcement front and center. As the 2024 elections approach, immigration and border control are set to become defining issues in the national conversation.
For the NBPC and its supporters, Trump’s track record on immigration isn’t just about politics—it’s about effective governance. Their endorsement goes beyond party lines; it’s a call for leadership that understands the real, daily challenges faced by those on the frontlines of border security. They see Trump as the leader who will stand with border agents, secure the nation’s boundaries, and restore a sense of control. In their eyes, the future of America hinges on leadership that not only talks about border security but delivers on it.
Table of Contents
- Trump’s Border Security Accomplishments
- The Political Landscape
- Contrasting Approaches to Border Security
